draft-reschke-hab-02.txt   draft-reschke-hab-03.txt 
Network Working Group J. Reschke Network Working Group J. Reschke
Internet-Draft greenbytes Internet-Draft greenbytes
Intended status: Informational December 22, 2009 Intended status: Informational December 26, 2009
Expires: June 25, 2010 Expires: June 29, 2010
Test Renditions for new RFC Headers & Boilerplate Test Renditions for new RFC Headers & Boilerplate
draft-reschke-hab-02 draft-reschke-hab-03
Abstract Abstract
This document contains test renditions for the new header and This document contains test renditions for the new header and
boilerplate values proposed in boilerplate values proposed in
draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates, and reports on the draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates, and reports on the
implementation status for xml2rfc processors. implementation status for xml2rfc processors.
Status of this Memo Status of this Memo
skipping to change at page 1, line 39 skipping to change at page 1, line 39
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on June 25, 2010. This Internet-Draft will expire on June 29, 2010.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 2, line 32 skipping to change at page 2, line 32
3.1.5. IETF Historic w/ consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1.5. IETF Historic w/ consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1.6. IETF Historic w/o consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1.6. IETF Historic w/o consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1.7. IETF Informational w/ consensus . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1.7. IETF Informational w/ consensus . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1.8. IETF Informational w/o consensus . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1.8. IETF Informational w/o consensus . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.2. IAB Stream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2. IAB Stream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.2.1. IAB Historic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2.1. IAB Historic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.2.2. IAB Informational . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2.2. IAB Informational . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.3. IRTF Stream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3. IRTF Stream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3.1. IRTF Experimental w/ RG consensus . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3.1. IRTF Experimental w/ RG consensus . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3.2. IRTF Experimental w/o RG consensus . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3.2. IRTF Experimental w/o RG consensus . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3.3. IRTF Historic w/ RG consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.3.3. IRTF Experimental (no RG) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.3.4. IRTF Historic w/o RG consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.3.4. IRTF Historic w/ RG consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.3.5. IRTF Informational w/ RG consensus . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.3.5. IRTF Historic w/o RG consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.3.6. IRTF Informational w/o RG consensus . . . . . . . . . 11 3.3.6. IRTF Historic (No RG) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.4. Independent Stream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.3.7. IRTF Informational w/ RG consensus . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.4.1. Independent Submission Experimental . . . . . . . . . 12 3.3.8. IRTF Informational w/o RG consensus . . . . . . . . . 13
3.4.2. Independent Submission Historic . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.3.9. IRTF Informational (No RG) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.4.3. Independent Submission Informational . . . . . . . . . 13 3.4. Independent Stream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.4.1. Independent Submission Experimental . . . . . . . . . 14
Appendix A. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.4.2. Independent Submission Historic . . . . . . . . . . . 14
A.1. Since draft-reschke-hab-00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.4.3. Independent Submission Informational . . . . . . . . . 15
A.2. Since draft-reschke-hab-01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Appendix A. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
A.1. Since draft-reschke-hab-00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
A.2. Since draft-reschke-hab-01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
A.3. Since draft-reschke-hab-02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
This document contains test renditions for the changes proposed in This document contains test renditions for the changes proposed in
[draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates], as generated by an [draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates], as generated by an
experimental version of rfc2629.xslt (see experimental version of rfc2629.xslt (see
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html>). <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html>).
Its purpose is to illustrate the resulting text for all the Its purpose is to illustrate the resulting text for all the
variations of the various input parameters, and to track the changes variations of the various input parameters, and to track the changes
applied to the proposal during the RFC-Editor's publication process. applied to the proposal during the RFC-Editor's publication process.
This draft has been updated to produce the text proposed by the RFC This draft has been updated to produce the text proposed by the RFC
Editor during the AUTH48 phase for RFC 5741-to-be, as of 2009-12-17. Editor during the AUTH48 phase for RFC 5741-to-be.
2. Implementation Status for Xml2Rfc 2. Implementation Status for Xml2Rfc
Please join the xml2rfc mailing list Please join the xml2rfc mailing list
(<http://lists.xml.resource.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>) for (<http://lists.xml.resource.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>) for
discussion of changes to the RFC 2629 vocabulary ([RFC2629]). discussion of changes to the RFC 2629 vocabulary ([RFC2629]).
2.1. rfc2629.xslt (XML -> XSLT -> (X)HTML|XSL-FO) 2.1. rfc2629.xslt (XML -> XSLT -> (X)HTML|XSL-FO)
The examples below were generated with an experimental version of The examples below were generated with an experimental version of
skipping to change at page 8, line 21 skipping to change at page 8, line 21
Internet Architecture Board (IAB) Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
Request for Comments: 9999 Request for Comments: 9999
Category: Historic Category: Historic
3.2.1.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo' 3.2.1.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo'
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for the historical record. published for the historical record.
This document defines a Historic Document for the Internet community. This document defines a Historic Document for the Internet community.
This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB), This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
and represents information that the IAB has deemed valuable to and represents information that the IAB has deemed valuable to
provide for permanent record. Documents approved for publication by provide for permanent record. Documents approved for publication by
the IAB are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see the IAB are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see
Section 2 of RFC 5741. Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999. http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999.
3.2.2. IAB Informational 3.2.2. IAB Informational
skipping to change at page 8, line 44 skipping to change at page 8, line 44
Internet Architecture Board (IAB) Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
Request for Comments: 9999 Request for Comments: 9999
Category: Informational Category: Informational
3.2.2.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo' 3.2.2.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo'
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes. published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB), This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
and represents information that the IAB has deemed valuable to and represents information that the IAB has deemed valuable to
provide for permanent record. Documents approved for publication by provide for permanent record. Documents approved for publication by
the IAB are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see the IAB are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see
Section 2 of RFC 5741. Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999. http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999.
3.3. IRTF Stream 3.3. IRTF Stream
skipping to change at page 10, line 14 skipping to change at page 10, line 14
suitable for deployment. This RFC represents the individual suitable for deployment. This RFC represents the individual
opinion(s) of one or more members of the <insert_name> Research Group opinion(s) of one or more members of the <insert_name> Research Group
of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). Documents approved for of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). Documents approved for
publication by the IRSG are not a candidate for any level of Internet publication by the IRSG are not a candidate for any level of Internet
Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741. Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999. http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999.
3.3.3. IRTF Historic w/ RG consensus 3.3.3. IRTF Experimental (no RG)
3.3.3.1. Header (Left Column) 3.3.3.1. Header (Left Column)
Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)
Request for Comments: 9999 Request for Comments: 9999
Category: Historic Category: Experimental
3.3.3.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo' 3.3.3.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo'
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for examination, experimental implementation, and
evaluation.
This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
community. This document is a product of the Internet Research Task
Force (IRTF). The IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related
research and development activities. These results might not be
suitable for deployment. Documents approved for publication by the
IRSG are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see
Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999.
3.3.4. IRTF Historic w/ RG consensus
3.3.4.1. Header (Left Column)
Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)
Request for Comments: 9999
Category: Historic
3.3.4.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo'
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for the historical record. published for the historical record.
This document defines a Historic Document for the Internet community. This document defines a Historic Document for the Internet community.
This document is a product of the Internet Research Task Force This document is a product of the Internet Research Task Force
(IRTF). The IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related research (IRTF). The IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related research
and development activities. These results might not be suitable for and development activities. These results might not be suitable for
deployment. This RFC represents the consensus of the <insert_name> deployment. This RFC represents the consensus of the <insert_name>
Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). Documents Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). Documents
approved for publication by the IRSG are not a candidate for any approved for publication by the IRSG are not a candidate for any
level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741. level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999. http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999.
3.3.4. IRTF Historic w/o RG consensus 3.3.5. IRTF Historic w/o RG consensus
3.3.4.1. Header (Left Column) 3.3.5.1. Header (Left Column)
Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)
Request for Comments: 9999 Request for Comments: 9999
Category: Historic Category: Historic
3.3.4.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo' 3.3.5.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo'
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for the historical record. published for the historical record.
This document defines a Historic Document for the Internet community. This document defines a Historic Document for the Internet community.
This document is a product of the Internet Research Task Force This document is a product of the Internet Research Task Force
(IRTF). The IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related research (IRTF). The IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related research
and development activities. These results might not be suitable for and development activities. These results might not be suitable for
deployment. This RFC represents the individual opinion(s) of one or deployment. This RFC represents the individual opinion(s) of one or
more members of the <insert_name> Research Group of the Internet more members of the <insert_name> Research Group of the Internet
Research Task Force (IRTF). Documents approved for publication by Research Task Force (IRTF). Documents approved for publication by
the IRSG are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see the IRSG are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see
Section 2 of RFC 5741. Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999. http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999.
3.3.5. IRTF Informational w/ RG consensus 3.3.6. IRTF Historic (No RG)
3.3.5.1. Header (Left Column) 3.3.6.1. Header (Left Column)
Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)
Request for Comments: 9999
Category: Historic
3.3.6.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo'
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for the historical record.
This document defines a Historic Document for the Internet community.
This document is a product of the Internet Research Task Force
(IRTF). The IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related research
and development activities. These results might not be suitable for
deployment. Documents approved for publication by the IRSG are not a
candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC
5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999.
3.3.7. IRTF Informational w/ RG consensus
3.3.7.1. Header (Left Column)
Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)
Request for Comments: 9999 Request for Comments: 9999
Category: Informational Category: Informational
3.3.5.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo' 3.3.7.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo'
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes. published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Research Task Force This document is a product of the Internet Research Task Force
(IRTF). The IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related research (IRTF). The IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related research
and development activities. These results might not be suitable for and development activities. These results might not be suitable for
deployment. This RFC represents the consensus of the <insert_name> deployment. This RFC represents the consensus of the <insert_name>
Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). Documents Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). Documents
approved for publication by the IRSG are not a candidate for any approved for publication by the IRSG are not a candidate for any
level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741. level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999. http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999.
3.3.6. IRTF Informational w/o RG consensus 3.3.8. IRTF Informational w/o RG consensus
3.3.6.1. Header (Left Column)
3.3.8.1. Header (Left Column)
Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)
Request for Comments: 9999 Request for Comments: 9999
Category: Informational Category: Informational
3.3.6.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo' 3.3.8.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo'
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes. published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Research Task Force This document is a product of the Internet Research Task Force
(IRTF). The IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related research (IRTF). The IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related research
and development activities. These results might not be suitable for and development activities. These results might not be suitable for
deployment. This RFC represents the individual opinion(s) of one or deployment. This RFC represents the individual opinion(s) of one or
more members of the <insert_name> Research Group of the Internet more members of the <insert_name> Research Group of the Internet
Research Task Force (IRTF). Documents approved for publication by Research Task Force (IRTF). Documents approved for publication by
the IRSG are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see the IRSG are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see
Section 2 of RFC 5741. Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999. http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999.
3.3.9. IRTF Informational (No RG)
3.3.9.1. Header (Left Column)
Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)
Request for Comments: 9999
Category: Informational
3.3.9.2. Text of 'Status Of This Memo'
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Research Task Force
(IRTF). The IRTF publishes the results of Internet-related research
and development activities. These results might not be suitable for
deployment. Documents approved for publication by the IRSG are not a
candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC
5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9999.
3.4. Independent Stream 3.4. Independent Stream
3.4.1. Independent Submission Experimental 3.4.1. Independent Submission Experimental
3.4.1.1. Header (Left Column) 3.4.1.1. Header (Left Column)
Independent Submission Independent Submission
Request for Comments: 9999 Request for Comments: 9999
Category: Experimental Category: Experimental
skipping to change at page 14, line 20 skipping to change at page 16, line 4
[RFC2629] Rose, M., "Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML", RFC 2629, [RFC2629] Rose, M., "Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML", RFC 2629,
June 1999. June 1999.
[draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates] [draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates]
Daigle, L. and O. Kolkman, "On RFC Streams, Headers, and Daigle, L. and O. Kolkman, "On RFC Streams, Headers, and
Boilerplates", draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08 Boilerplates", draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08
(work in progress), April 2009. (work in progress), April 2009.
Appendix A. Change Log Appendix A. Change Log
A.1. Since draft-reschke-hab-00 A.1. Since draft-reschke-hab-00
Updated to RFC 5741-to-be as of 2009-12-17: (i) expanded submission Updated to RFC 5741-to-be as of 2009-12-17: (i) expanded submission
stream names, (2) replaced "RFC XXXX" by "RFC 5741". stream names, (2) replaced "RFC XXXX" by "RFC 5741".
A.2. Since draft-reschke-hab-01 A.2. Since draft-reschke-hab-01
Fix oversight: "Not all documents approved by the IESG are candidate Fix oversight: "Not all documents approved by the IESG are candidate
for any level of Internet Standards" -> "Not all documents approved for any level of Internet Standards" -> "Not all documents approved
by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet Standard". by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet Standard".
A.3. Since draft-reschke-hab-02
Remove a superfluous comma, and add examples for IRTF documents not
coming from a RG.
Author's Address Author's Address
Julian F. Reschke Julian F. Reschke
greenbytes GmbH greenbytes GmbH
Hafenweg 16 Hafenweg 16
Muenster, NW 48155 Muenster, NW 48155
Germany Germany
Email: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de Email: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
URI: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/ URI: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/
 End of changes. 21 change blocks. 
32 lines changed or deleted 116 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.45. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/